I do not know if you feel more anger or resignation to read the news of clashes between students took place in Piazza Navona, in front of police buildings struck by lightning apathy. The resignation comes from noting that now we see the facts as extremely serious what happened yesterday, slipped on without reacting, watching the terrible gap that far for victims of earthquakes in scattered regions of the Middle East.
Yet, already in recent weeks, had denounced the prime minister's attitude, if not of interest, at least expected to participate, as to whether the peaceful demonstrations of opposition to the Gelmini decree were marred by violence between participants. I remember so Veltroni summon assistance for the definition of "troublemakers" that the premier had given to students demonstrators. Today, even doing so with a greater show of force that Veltroni did not have, being able to explain As the Italians might be dangerous words is impossible. Over the last fifteen years, Berlusconi has shown (fully convincing his opponents to borrow attitudes) as communication policy should be packaged as if speaking to a child of twelve years. The byproduct of this (historians will tell you if and how much it was wanted or not) is that today almost the entire world of communications is regressed to the point to talk about itself as a child of twelve years. Now "wise", "exalted", "rowdy", "troublemakers," "violent", "communists" and "fascists" are at last, become blurred and this synonym lexical confusion generated symmetrically inability and lack of will to analyze, contextualize, and ultimately, explain what is happening. Today no one is asked to account for the words he uses, so that policy has become increasingly popular habit of issuing statements, which saggiatone near real-time impact, are immediately accompanied by an official interpretation, authentic. Everything is so removed from any independent evaluation, and no one should ever respond to anything.
a few days ago are targeted advice that former President Cossiga gave to the press to his successor Maroni at the Interior Ministry. The resignation is to see how shabby is now the policy prescription of obscenities: the usual manipulation of public opinion, the usual subjects aware of infiltration or misused, the usual suppression of dissent with the approval of the silent majority and duped. So, back to yesterday, the usual pickup truck drove people who had come a little 'hands, to feel a bit' more important than anything they are and to do their homework, just as others had decided they should do.
things I've seen hundreds of times in Italy.
And the anger? The political struggle of the seventies was for the very idea of \u200b\u200bstate, our place in the world. We spent it with force (up to the excesses that generated monsters, as we all know) to change their social position, ask for a better world and a more just society. Is pursued, that is, objectives, if you do not want to say high or noble, however ambitious, who in every age men of every belief they have chosen to devote his life.
Well, anger is to see that today our political passion will be resolved in a virtually exclusive nell'azzuffarci for the faction to which we have chosen to belong to both successful and to consolidate power. Conversely little or no interest today the contents of the policy, that is what we should consider the ultimate goal of our own political participation.
Italy, today, is an unrepentant playboy, who finally received the fateful call to rise up for a drink, smiles, cheers, climb into the car and goes home to watch TV.
Yet, already in recent weeks, had denounced the prime minister's attitude, if not of interest, at least expected to participate, as to whether the peaceful demonstrations of opposition to the Gelmini decree were marred by violence between participants. I remember so Veltroni summon assistance for the definition of "troublemakers" that the premier had given to students demonstrators. Today, even doing so with a greater show of force that Veltroni did not have, being able to explain As the Italians might be dangerous words is impossible. Over the last fifteen years, Berlusconi has shown (fully convincing his opponents to borrow attitudes) as communication policy should be packaged as if speaking to a child of twelve years. The byproduct of this (historians will tell you if and how much it was wanted or not) is that today almost the entire world of communications is regressed to the point to talk about itself as a child of twelve years. Now "wise", "exalted", "rowdy", "troublemakers," "violent", "communists" and "fascists" are at last, become blurred and this synonym lexical confusion generated symmetrically inability and lack of will to analyze, contextualize, and ultimately, explain what is happening. Today no one is asked to account for the words he uses, so that policy has become increasingly popular habit of issuing statements, which saggiatone near real-time impact, are immediately accompanied by an official interpretation, authentic. Everything is so removed from any independent evaluation, and no one should ever respond to anything.
a few days ago are targeted advice that former President Cossiga gave to the press to his successor Maroni at the Interior Ministry. The resignation is to see how shabby is now the policy prescription of obscenities: the usual manipulation of public opinion, the usual subjects aware of infiltration or misused, the usual suppression of dissent with the approval of the silent majority and duped. So, back to yesterday, the usual pickup truck drove people who had come a little 'hands, to feel a bit' more important than anything they are and to do their homework, just as others had decided they should do.
things I've seen hundreds of times in Italy.
And the anger? The political struggle of the seventies was for the very idea of \u200b\u200bstate, our place in the world. We spent it with force (up to the excesses that generated monsters, as we all know) to change their social position, ask for a better world and a more just society. Is pursued, that is, objectives, if you do not want to say high or noble, however ambitious, who in every age men of every belief they have chosen to devote his life.
Well, anger is to see that today our political passion will be resolved in a virtually exclusive nell'azzuffarci for the faction to which we have chosen to belong to both successful and to consolidate power. Conversely little or no interest today the contents of the policy, that is what we should consider the ultimate goal of our own political participation.
Italy, today, is an unrepentant playboy, who finally received the fateful call to rise up for a drink, smiles, cheers, climb into the car and goes home to watch TV.
